Quick List Warning Signs:
- Unsatisfactory record at the Better Business Bureau
- Pattern of complaints at the BBB
- Unanswered complaints at the BBB
- Claim Al Capone started the BBB
- Conflict of interest
- Upfront fees
- High prices
- High sales pressure
- Guaranteed work
- No website
- No tear sheets
- No client list
- Pricing not on website
- Hidden fees
- Extra expenses (total cost) not communicated
- Not up front about basic important issue(s)
- Website FAQ does not answer basic important question(s)
- Training not free
- Online portfolio not free
- Specific photographer required
- Manipulation to use specific photographer
- Agency makes profit from photography
- Website address of "professional photographer" not provided
- Company has its own photographer or own photo studio
- Pictures taken by photographer do not look professional
- High fees for web portfolio
- High fees for infant photos
- Professional photos for infants
- Professional photos for kids under four years old
- Most models make less money than they pay for photos
- Late payments for completed work
- Leaders have history of fraud
- Leaders previously prosecuted by the Federal Trade Commission
- No agency license
- Published news reports allege fraud, greed, corruption
- The words "scam" or "fraud" are often used in online discussions of the company
- Local media issued warnings and consumer alerts
- State consumer protection agency issued warnings and consumer alerts
- False/misleading/unsubstantiated advertising
- Claim famous agencies use the company to seek models
- Claim top agencies use the internet to seek models
- Claimed/implied affiliation with celebrities
- Claim they started the career(s) of supermodel(s)
- Claim supermodels use the service
- Claim supermodel started the company
- Company promotes lucrative modeling but its models only get "minimum-wage" "modeling"
- Company talks like an agency, or says it is an agency, but it is not an agency, and has no license
- Pictures of models on the office wall also available at K-Mart
- Company name includes "International" but it has no offices in other countries and no model placement in other countries
- Slams other types of modeling businesses (convention slamming schools; schools slamming conventions)
- New company
- Payment only accepted in cash or money order
- No receipt given unless asked
- Imbalance in financial risk (one-sided for consumer)
- No money-back guarantee
- No refunds
- Company makes profit even if models get no work
- Company's models do not look like models/have not received work
- Company seeks long-term exclusive model contract with new/untested model
- Firm does not mention and BBB record does not include its success rate (placement record)
- Model scouts are not model bookers
- Model scouts are paid by the number of people they recruit, not the amount of work the models get
- Company recruits models in state(s) where it has no office(s)
- Company seeks quota (x number of new models)
- Company pretends to be highly selective ("only 2% are selected" and 98% fail, when in reality it is more like 98% who are selected and 2% fail)
- Use of important-sounding positions like "Talent Executive" which require no training and no skill
- Claims someone else (who is important) has to make the selection decision to make them appear to be selective
- Very high new model selection rate
- Very high ratio of models to staff
- Company runs a national photo directory (online/print)
- Overall impression the company is really most interested in making/taking money
- Business plan designed for fast, easy money (requires low effort, low experience, low skill, low performance)
- The "free open call" or "free audition" is nothing more than a contrived meeting for a sales pitch (to sell classes, convention, online portfolio hosting, etc.)
- It would be difficult to hold the company accountable if the model signed a contract because the agency is in another state
- Address is only a PO Box number, not a street address
- Business partnerships which create conflict of interest (e.g. schools with agency; schools with convention; agency with photographer; photographer with convention)
- Convention contestants not screened by agents with photos prior to convention
- Oral representations different from written representations
- Nothing in writing
- Emphasis of marketing to aspiring models is the (models') future potential not the (company's) past; fame ("you could be a star"), money ("you could make millions"), the dream, etc.
- Emphasis of marketing is call backs (low standard), not placement rate (high standard)
- Little if any time given to background check company and review contract
- Minimal or minimum cooling-off period allowed to change mind
- Representation to aspiring/untested/new model that work will be offered immediately, be easy to get, and pay extremely well
- Most work the agency gets is for events ("promotional"), not print, not editorial, not commercial, not fashion
- Calls itself a modeling school when it is more accurately called a finishing school or a charm school
- Represents training at a finishing school is required to become a model
- Claims a model must be trained to be signed
- New models are not signed until they have paid for training
"The last place is still open"